Kevin Zito
KNIFE MAKER
I’m available whenever you need.Kevin’s over here winning a Fields Medal in his spare time and John’s looking up youtube videos to try to remember how to do trig functions to help his son do homework LOL.
I’m available whenever you need.Kevin’s over here winning a Fields Medal in his spare time and John’s looking up youtube videos to try to remember how to do trig functions to help his son do homework LOL.
That’s like asking Evel Knievel to help me ride a bicycleI’m available whenever you need.
Looks pretty convoluted to me. The closest thing I can relate to is Tensor Calculus. But I have a feeling that's not it.Convolution. For those of you who don't know what Zito is talking about. This will clear it right up.
View attachment 77873
I got the prophet reference though!
Ok so you see how convolution turns the graph with 2 sharp edges into graphs with 1 sharp edge? An instantaneous creation even would have a graph that has one extremely sharp pointy edge. Convolution can turn that graph into a graph with no point edges. Then we can use regular calculus to study said event. This is all very new and theoretical, however, I really think we may be on to something. Who knows though.Convolution. For those of you who don't know what Zito is talking about. This will clear it right up.
View attachment 77873
I got the prophet reference though!
OK. So I use the band saw to cut the handle to shape with pointy sharp edges and then 80 grit sandpaper to make it have no point edges... and that's now convoluted?Ok so you see how convolution turns the graph with 2 sharp edges into graphs with 1 sharp edge? An instantaneous creation even would have a graph that has one extremely sharp pointy edge. Convolution can turn that graph into a graph with no point edges. Then we can use regular calculus to study said event. This is all very new and theoretical, however, I really think we may be on to something. Who knows though.
Lol the last two are the most famous unsolved problems in mathematics.I don’t deal with convolution. But i have been trying to solve Discombobulation using the Caddywompus Theorem. I wish I could share my work, but it only involves imaginary numbers and my keyboard doesn’t have those. And being imaginary, the resulting graphs are invisible. As you can imagine it’s very hard to study these graphs. The shocking revelations of my work are that the results are predictably unpredictable and apply directly to the study of female psychology and caucasian dance rhythms.
I may need your help, Kevin, particularly with the application to female psychology. The premise is that you should already know the answer without asking any questions. The equation always simplifies to a differential equation beginning with a null set and infinite variables, where the answers are Everything and Nothing, expressed in units of Tf (fine then) and Mn ((nevermind).Lol the last two are the most famous unsolved problems in mathematics.
If Zito can't help you, I most certainly can. The obvious answer is (and ALWAYS will be) : yes, dear.I may need your help, Kevin, particularly with the application to female psychology. The premise is that you should already know the answer without asking any questions. The equation always simplifies to a differential equation beginning with a null set and infinite variables, where the answers are Everything and Nothing, expressed in units of Tf (fine then) and Mn ((nevermind).
The graph is always a circle where the end point brings you back to the beginning. No matter how I work the problem it results in Error. I tried to define the limits of the circle by finding a point, but whenever I establish a point there’s always a tangent MF (my fault).
Can you help me?
Yes...that cleared it right up....Convolution. For those of you who don't know what Zito is talking about. This will clear it right up.
View attachment 77873
I got the prophet reference though!
Wait a minute....isn't it Nm? Let's get the nomenclature correct John!Everything and Nothing, expressed in units of Tf (fine then) and Mn ((nevermind).
Nm is already Newton Meters, whereas the soundness of my theory has the force of a dyne erg.Wait a minute....isn't it Nm? Let's get the nomenclature correct John!
I'm with you Ted. But I am certain that a dyin egg smells mighty powerful. Specially if the one who lays it had some beer first. That prolly changes the equation though. Hafta wait for profs wilson or zito to clarify the relativity of this new part of the equation. Convoluted enough yet , professor?I don't know what a dyin' erg is....but I'm sure it's very forceful...lol.