DonL
Well-Known Member
Funny thing. Now that I'm making knives, I'm paying a lot of attention to things I didn't in the past.
One thing that has me baffled is handle ergonomics. Maybe it's because most of my experiences with knives up until a few years ago were with production knives, but it seems like a lot of custom makers are going with larger knife handles these days.
I have a pretty good size paw and most of these knives seem too large for my hands. I can only imagine how they feel to others.
I've been using knives ever since I was old enough to let out of the house. I prefer a "normal" sized handle on a knife. It just seems that I can control a smaller handle better with less fatigue. I use most of my knives outdoors for things like camping, fishing, chores and hunting.
For example, the largest handle I've put on a knife measures about .800 across (total thickness from one side to another). That's a pair of Dymonwood scales on a 3/16 blade. The height of the handle is about 1 inch. It feels "big" in my hand. The handles I prefer are in the .600 to .750 range (total width across the handle). Also, a handle with about an inch of height seems to be the most comfortable for me.
In contrast, I have a few recent purchase that the handle width is at or over 1 inch for a 1/8th blade. It's a beautiful knife but the handle just seems too large!
I had a few buddies over today and I remembered this subject. I know what types of knives they use. Just for the heck of it, I went and got a few of my custom knives and let them try them. Their opinions mirrored mine. Too large and too short! I think most utility/hunting knives should have a minimum of a 4 1/2 gripping surface at the bottom. We thought very few of the 4 inch handled knives felt as comfortable as those with 4 1/2" handles.
I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on this and how you come up with your handle designs.
One thing that has me baffled is handle ergonomics. Maybe it's because most of my experiences with knives up until a few years ago were with production knives, but it seems like a lot of custom makers are going with larger knife handles these days.
I have a pretty good size paw and most of these knives seem too large for my hands. I can only imagine how they feel to others.
I've been using knives ever since I was old enough to let out of the house. I prefer a "normal" sized handle on a knife. It just seems that I can control a smaller handle better with less fatigue. I use most of my knives outdoors for things like camping, fishing, chores and hunting.
For example, the largest handle I've put on a knife measures about .800 across (total thickness from one side to another). That's a pair of Dymonwood scales on a 3/16 blade. The height of the handle is about 1 inch. It feels "big" in my hand. The handles I prefer are in the .600 to .750 range (total width across the handle). Also, a handle with about an inch of height seems to be the most comfortable for me.
In contrast, I have a few recent purchase that the handle width is at or over 1 inch for a 1/8th blade. It's a beautiful knife but the handle just seems too large!
I had a few buddies over today and I remembered this subject. I know what types of knives they use. Just for the heck of it, I went and got a few of my custom knives and let them try them. Their opinions mirrored mine. Too large and too short! I think most utility/hunting knives should have a minimum of a 4 1/2 gripping surface at the bottom. We thought very few of the 4 inch handled knives felt as comfortable as those with 4 1/2" handles.
I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on this and how you come up with your handle designs.