rob45, I use belts upto 320 grit, sometimes 400, I have problems with belt bumping with finer grits, so 400 is as far as I go for finishing, then go to hand sanding.
Yep, the finer-grit belts can cause this to happen. The dreaded belt splice gives a similar problem for those using the really small contact wheels.
For that problem, the best solution I have found so far is to either use it as a slack belt, or a soft contact wheel (40 Duro).
I realize this may go against the conventional wisdom of having a very stiff backing to maintain crisp lines and edges, but, for me anyways, the higher grits don't mess things up as long as I keep the pressure light. I like to slow belt speed down, too.
If you can't find a way to make belts work for you, the link to Ed Caffrey's post provided by Uncle Billy is worth checking into, if you haven't already.
My buffer is 3450 rpm, I know a little to fast, but it is what I have.
Please see my comments about this below.
On a mirror finish, I want all scratches out...
Sometimes I miss a few scratches, and they sure look bad in a mirror finish.
Absolutely. I am very "old school" concerning that concept.
Shortcuts usually don't pan out the way we want them to.
I suppose the best we can do is adhere to the normal grit progressions and use the machines to make it quicker and easier.
The one exception to this may be a tip that Ed Caffrey presented in a thread recently: post #6 in this thread http://knifedogs.com/showthread.php?18445-Blaze-v.-977s
I have not yet tried the suggestion, but am interested and plan to see how it pans out for me. Like any other technology, the field of abrasives is ever-improving, so perhaps I'm a little "behind the times".
You mentioned the speed of your buffer (3450 RPM) as "being a little too fast". Maybe, maybe not. It really depends on the material you're working, and the wheel size.
I suppose I should have provided more clarity when I asked you about speeds.
Concerning "speed", the real objective is to obtain a desired SFPM (surface feet per minute).
All material removal will be based upon pressure in combination with speed (with the proper removal agent). It doesn't matter what material- wood, plastic, various metals, etc. This concept also applies to differing types of removal, be it cutting, drilling, grinding, sanding, or buffing.
Whatever it be, there will be general guidelines as to what combinations have been proven to work best.
For our applications, the pressure is variable, as we apply the pressure with our own hands. Finding the correct pressure is what elevates our finishing procedures to an "art form". But we can certainly narrow down the variables if we know speeds.
Everyone has their own methods, but here is what works for me.
I like to run as fast as the material allows- I'm using a machine to speed the process up, and it only makes sense to me to take full advantage of it.
This doesn't matter whether I'm grinding, sanding, or polishing- my speeds stay the same, but the abrasives, backings, and pressures change.
For carbon steels, 5000-7000 SFPM gets the job done for me.
The stainless steels seem to prefer slower speeds, so I slow it to anywhere between 3000-5000 SFPM.
You can experiment with different circumstances to see what works best for you. Don't be too concerned about exact speeds; you're simply trying to find a
range that works for you.
Assuming your buffer is a direct-drive unit, here are the surface speeds that 3450 RPM will give you with common wheel diameters:
4"...3613 SFPM
6"...5419 SFPM
8"...7226 SFPM
So if you want to change the amount of time you spend on your operations, simply adjust your equipment to do the work in less time.
But there are limits. For example, I have found no difference in speeds of, say 7000 versus 8000. Materials don't like it, equipment doesn't like it, and application becomes considerably more critical.
So it will do you no good to run a 10" wheel on your particular machine.
How much ground do you cover by hand?
Well, the "average" human can sand 50 feet per minute with a slow, steady pace, and get up around 125 with "fast" sanding.
This brings up a special consideration in regards to the orbital sander modification mentioned by Ed.
I have had several look at all of this "speed of removal" concept and give retort similar to this:
"Well, if the average orbital sander gives about 14,000 orbits per minute, and has a 1/16" orbit, then that only equates to about 75 feet per minute! I can do it by hand quicker than that!"
Indeed, they are correct. But a human will quickly tire out, and, more importantly, the applied pressure will be much more inconsistent. In the end, the "lowly" orbital hand sander will get the job done quicker.
Don't let my illustrations about buffers throw you off, as these concepts apply just as much to grinding and sanding as well.
What it all comes down to is that if doing it by hand is not fast enough for our needs, we need to rely on the machines, tailoring them to our individual satisfactions.
Best of Luck,
Rob