I am new to the field of knife alloys, but I think I am correct in thinking that even a very high quality steel with proper geometry can perform poorly if poorly tempered, and that tempering is more complex than just achieving a particular Rockwell number. So that two knives of similar geometry and the same steel, but by two different makers, may perform very differently, for example one being prone to micro-chipping and the other not, one holding a useful edge longer than the other, etc.
I am interested in the Blade-Tech Pro Hunter (S30V), in part because I have a Spyderco Wegner Junior (ATS-34) by the same designer. I am not sure if Mr Wegner simply designed for Blade Tech or if he in fact founded the company. But what I really want to ascertain is if the Pro Hunter (which is specified at Rc 58.5 - 59.0 and a 30º-inclusive edge) is generally considered a particularly well-made (and correctly tempered) application of S30V? The knife seems not to have achieved great popularity since it not widely discussed and as well is no longer made: which could be due to inferior blade quality.
Any information about this knife would be appreciated.
I am interested in the Blade-Tech Pro Hunter (S30V), in part because I have a Spyderco Wegner Junior (ATS-34) by the same designer. I am not sure if Mr Wegner simply designed for Blade Tech or if he in fact founded the company. But what I really want to ascertain is if the Pro Hunter (which is specified at Rc 58.5 - 59.0 and a 30º-inclusive edge) is generally considered a particularly well-made (and correctly tempered) application of S30V? The knife seems not to have achieved great popularity since it not widely discussed and as well is no longer made: which could be due to inferior blade quality.
Any information about this knife would be appreciated.