rhinoknives
Well-Known Member
There is an opportunity for education and good discussion here, but not of we are going to adhere to absolutes, opinion often consists of absolutes, reality rarely has use for them.
No material is perfect but there are imperfections, and then there are fatal flaws, there is a whole gamut of conditions between perfection and useless. Thus the shortcomings of asolutes.
Agreed, but then comes the absolutes…
Steel should be treated as steel, if there is a problem in it that the standard procedures cannot handle then those exceptions have to be dealt with on an individual basis, rather than lowering the bar and expectations across the board. That is how the rest of the metalworking world approaches it rather than expecting the worse and treating the most versatile material in the history of mankind with kid gloves. If this absolute held true we would have moved on from steel for a better material long ago, or perhaps stuck with the much more homogenous and predictable bronze.
If absolutes held true then all would share your experience and observations, and I for one have not. I have been squeezing and pushing my steel for most of my life now, and while I have observed many of the same inconsistencies, often microscopically, I have found them to be problematic very small percentage of the time. The vast majority of them can be easily navigated with consistent, standardized methods, and the knowledge necessary to troubleshoot them.
No, merely switching to a different batch or run of steel will normally do the trick.
Now, is the steel supply out there getting a bit lax in quality due to creeping trace elements and a wide array of manufacturing standards around the world? It sure is, and we do have to deal with it, so a constructive discussion on how to best do that would be a plus.:thumbup: But it would seem that you are trying to show somebody, or their position, as “wrong” or “false”, by characterizing the position with absolutes, what would traditionally be called a straw man or paper tiger argument, which will be more difficult to glean constructive input from.
If I am to expect the usual pattern this thread will probably soon veer into a crusade about quenchants or the merits of forging, which I see you have already touched on. If you want to have a chat about how to best deal with steel inconsistencies I think that would be a good thing, I have plenty of things I have picked up over the years that I could share in such a discussion, but if something or somebody has set off another episode, I think it would be best to address it or them one on one rather than disappoint all those who look forward to a good thread for objectively troubleshooting steel inconsistencies.
Tai & Kevin
First I work by stock removal and I purchase my steels by sheet or half sheet from www.nsm-ny.com Stainless and tool. They provide a analysis sheet of the consistency of the trade name steel, Such as CPM-154 or CPM-S35VN etc..
While this doesn't guarantee that the steel is free of inclusions? It does put me in the right dirction and I theorize myself?? that the fine grain structure of the CPM steels also helps in guarding against inclusions being so big that the knife has to be discarded.
So far so good, I also grind after heat treatment and I have had only one knife crack in heat treatment in over 3000.
Laurence
www.rhinoknives.com